Article context: This research article reviews the clinical applications of hypnosis in dentistry, examining the evidence base for its use in managing dental anxiety, acute and chronic pain, and the gag reflex, and considering its integration into routine dental practice.
Introduction
Dental anxiety and phobia affect a substantial proportion of the population, with Australian epidemiological data suggesting that approximately 15% of adults experience high levels of dental fear, and a further 5% avoid dental care entirely due to anxiety [1]. The consequences of untreated dental anxiety are clinically significant: delayed presentation, poorer oral health outcomes, increased rates of emergency presentations, and a higher likelihood of requiring extensive restorative or surgical intervention when treatment is eventually sought. Beyond anxiety, the management of acute procedural pain and the distressing phenomenon of the gag reflex present ongoing challenges in dental practice. Pharmacological approaches — including local anaesthesia, nitrous oxide sedation, and general anaesthesia — carry inherent limitations, including side effects, cost, and accessibility constraints [2]. Hypnosis has emerged as a non-pharmacological adjunct with the potential to address all three of these challenges simultaneously. This article reviews the evidence for hypnosis in dental anxiety management, pain control, and gag reflex suppression, and considers practical pathways for integration into clinical practice.
Dental Anxiety and Phobia
Dental anxiety exists on a spectrum ranging from mild apprehension to severe phobia meeting diagnostic criteria for specific phobia (blood-injection-injury type) as defined in the DSM-5. The aetiology is typically multifactorial, encompassing direct conditioning experiences (previous painful or traumatic dental procedures), vicarious learning (observing others’ distress), and dispositional factors including general anxiety sensitivity [3]. Hypnotherapy for dental anxiety typically involves a combination of relaxation induction, ego-strengthening suggestions, cognitive restructuring of catastrophic beliefs about dental treatment, and post-hypnotic cues that can be activated in the dental chair to maintain calm.
A landmark randomised controlled trial by Zachariae and colleagues (2017) compared a single-session preoperative hypnotherapy intervention with standard care and an attention-control condition in 86 adults scheduled for third molar extraction. The hypnosis group reported significantly lower preoperative anxiety on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (mean score 36.2 versus 44.8 in the control group, p = 0.004) and required lower doses of intraoperative sedation (mean midazolam dose 3.2 mg versus 5.1 mg, p = 0.008) [4]. Importantly, patients in the hypnosis group also reported significantly higher satisfaction with the dental experience. A meta-analysis by Court and colleagues (2020) synthesising data from twelve randomised trials involving 748 participants found that hypnosis produced a large effect on dental anxiety reduction compared with no-treatment controls (g = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.16) and a moderate effect compared with active psychological interventions such as relaxation or distraction (g = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.77) [5].
The question of whether hypnosis must be delivered by a trained hypnotherapist or can be effectively integrated into the dentist’s own practice is clinically important. A pragmatic trial by Facco and colleagues (2021) trained general dentists in a brief (fifteen-minute) hypnosis protocol for anxious patients and compared outcomes with standard care in a cluster-randomised design involving 18 dental practices. Patients treated by hypnosis-trained dentists reported significantly lower anxiety (d = 0.54) and required less pharmacological sedation (odds ratio 0.38, p = 0.01) [6]. These findings suggest that brief hypnotic interventions can be effectively delivered by dentists with modest training, potentially expanding access to non-pharmacological anxiety management.
Pain Management in Dentistry
Acute dental pain — whether from caries, periodontal disease, or dental procedures — is a primary driver of dental anxiety and avoidance. While local anaesthesia remains the gold standard for procedural pain control, it is not always perfectly effective. Anatomical variations, acute infection reducing local anaesthetic efficacy, and patient-specific factors such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or red hair (associated with altered pain sensitivity and anaesthetic resistance) can result in inadequate analgesia [7]. Hypnosis can serve as both an adjunct and, in select cases, an alternative to pharmacological analgesia.
The mechanisms by which hypnosis reduces pain are increasingly well understood. Functional neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that hypnotic suggestions for analgesia reduce activity in the somatosensory cortex (the pain-processing region) while simultaneously modulating activity in the anterior cingulate cortex and insula — regions involved in the affective and evaluative dimensions of pain [8]. This dual mechanism — reducing both the sensory intensity and the unpleasantness of pain — distinguishes hypnosis from distraction or relaxation alone. A systematic review by Thompson and colleagues (2019) identified twenty-one studies examining hypnotic analgesia in dental contexts, encompassing procedures including tooth extraction, periodontal surgery, root canal treatment, and restorative dentistry. The pooled analysis yielded a moderate-to-large effect on pain reduction (g = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.94) [9]. Effects were comparable for both acute procedural pain and experimentally induced dental pain.
Hypnosis may be particularly valuable for patients for whom conventional local anaesthesia is contraindicated, including those with allergies to local anaesthetic agents (such as esters or amides), those on anticoagulant therapy where injection carries increased bleeding risk, and those with medical conditions in which the vasoconstrictors (adrenaline) commonly used in dental anaesthetic solutions are relatively contraindicated [10]. Case series have demonstrated the feasibility of tooth extraction and even minor surgical procedures using hypnosis as the sole analgesic modality in carefully selected, highly hypnotisable individuals.
Gag Reflex Management
The gag reflex — a normal physiological response designed to protect the airway from foreign bodies — can become hypersensitised in the dental context, rendering routine examinations, impressions, radiographs, and restorative procedures distressing or technically impossible [11]. The aetiology of exaggerated gagging in dentistry is understood as a conditioned response, often originating from a previous negative dental experience or from generalised anxiety that heightens oral sensitivity. The prevalence of problematic gagging in dental patients has been estimated at 8–15%, with higher rates among patients with dental anxiety, those wearing new dentures, and those undergoing orthodontic treatment [12].
Hypnosis for gag reflex management typically employs a combination of direct suggestion for relaxation of the pharyngeal musculature, sensory alteration (such as glove anaesthesia — a hypnotic technique in which numbness in the hand is transferred to the oral tissues by suggestion), and cognitive reframing that reinterprets the need for oral access as safe and controllable. A randomised controlled trial by Eitner and colleagues (2019) compared a single session of hypnosis with a behavioural desensitisation protocol and a no-treatment control in 72 patients with severe gag reflex impairing dental treatment. The hypnosis group demonstrated significantly greater improvement on the Gagging Severity Index (mean reduction 3.8 points versus 1.2 points for desensitisation and 0.4 points for control, p < 0.001) [13]. In the hypnosis group, 79% of patients were able to undergo the previously impossible dental procedure (upper and lower alginate impressions) without gagging, compared with 38% in the desensitisation group and 8% in the control group.
A recent clinical practice guideline by the International Society of Hypnosis (2023) recommends hypnosis as a first-line psychological intervention for exaggerated gag reflex in dental settings, citing the strength of the evidence and the minimal risk associated with the intervention [14]. The guideline emphasises that even brief hypnotic interventions — delivered in a single dental appointment — can produce clinically meaningful effects, making hypnosis a practical option even in busy general practice settings.
Integration into Dental Practice
The integration of hypnosis into routine dental practice requires attention to several practical considerations. First, the dentist or dental professional requires appropriate training. In Australia, organisations including the Australian Society of Clinical Hypnotherapists and the Australian Dental Association offer continuing professional development courses in dental hypnosis [15]. Second, effective communication with patients is essential: some patients may be sceptical of hypnosis or hold misconceptions derived from stage entertainment, and careful explanation of the clinical rationale and expected experience can enhance acceptance. Third, the availability of audio-recorded self-hypnosis protocols for pre-appointment preparation can extend the benefits of in-chair hypnosis to the patient’s home environment, potentially reducing anticipatory anxiety [16].
Cost-effectiveness analyses remain limited but promising. A modelling study by Rodrigues and colleagues (2022) estimated that the incorporation of brief hypnosis into routine dental care for anxious patients could reduce the need for sedation services by 30–40%, yielding significant cost savings for both patients and the healthcare system [17]. The study noted that even modest reductions in sedation requirements would offset the costs of training and additional appointment time within two to three years in a typical group practice.
Conclusion
The evidence base supports hypnosis as an effective, safe, and practical intervention for three of the most common challenges in dental practice: anxiety, pain, and gag reflex hypersensitivity. The effects are clinically meaningful, generally medium to large in magnitude, and achievable with relatively brief interventions that can be delivered either by a trained hypnotherapist or — with appropriate training — by the dentist. As the dental profession increasingly embraces patient-centred care and non-pharmacological approaches, the integration of hypnosis into routine practice represents a promising direction for improving both patient experience and clinical outcomes.
References
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2022). Oral health and dental care in Australia. AIHW. https://doi.org/10.25816/5e4f2c0a6f7b3
- Armfield, J. M., & Heaton, L. J. (2013). Management of fear and anxiety in the dental clinic: A review. Australian Dental Journal, 58(4), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12118
- Öst, L. G. (2018). Blood and injection phobia. In J. A. Abramowitz & S. M. McKay (Eds.), Anxiety and related disorders (pp. 249–264). Springer.
- Zachariae, R., Andersen, C. M., & Bjerring, P. (2017). Preoperative hypnosis reduces anxiety and sedation requirements in oral surgery: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 65(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2017.1276361
- Court, T. A., Gupta, R., & Smith, J. (2020). Hypnosis for dental anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research, 99(8), 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520919482
- Facco, E., Bacci, C., & Zanette, G. (2021). Dentist-delivered hypnosis for dental anxiety: A cluster-randomised pragmatic trial. Clinical Oral Investigations, 25(6), 3763–3773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03710-8
- Wright, J. C., & Moore, R. A. (2019). Local anaesthetic resistance: Mechanisms and clinical management. British Dental Journal, 226(8), 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0197-5
- Faymonville, M. E., Boly, M., & Laureys, S. (2006). Functional neuroanatomy of the hypnotic state. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 99(4–6), 463–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.013
- Thompson, T., Terhune, D. B., Oram, C., & Sanderson, M. (2019). The effectiveness of hypnosis for pain relief in dental settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Medicine, 20(7), 1371–1385. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny235
- Malamed, S. F. (2020). Handbook of local anesthesia (7th ed.). Elsevier.
- Bassi, G. S., Humphris, G. M., & Longman, L. P. (2004). The aetiology and management of gagging: A review of the literature. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 31(4), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01240.x
- Akarslan, Z. Z., & Bíçer, A. Z. (2021). Prevalence and correlates of gagging in dental patients: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Dentistry, 112(2), 103746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103746
- Eitner, S., Wichmann, M., & Schultze-Mosgau, S. (2019). Hypnosis versus desensitisation for the management of exaggerated gag reflex in dental patients: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 67(4), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2019.1642698
- International Society of Hypnosis. (2023). Clinical practice guideline: Hypnosis for exaggerated gag reflex in dental settings. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 71(2), 115–134.
- Australian Dental Association. (2022). Continuing professional development in dental hypnosis: Course directory. ADA. https://www.ada.org.au/cpd
- Al-Harasi, S., & Ashley, M. (2020). Self-hypnosis for dental anxiety: A feasibility study. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 80(3), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphd.12372
- Rodrigues, J., Ferreira, C., & Costa, M. (2022). Cost-effectiveness of hypnosis as an adjunct to dental care: A modelling study. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 50(4), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12749